Keeping smoke out of welders’ breathing zone and making sure that the whole facility is free of welding fumes is a vital responsibility of manufacturers and plant owners. Manufacturers know that weld fumes threaten workers’ health and raise many other serious concerns, regardless of the operation performed – manual or robotic welding. If weld fumes are not captured, then the health of all workers (in the entire facility) can be put to risk.
Weld fumes contain toxic metals particulates. These less than a micrometer in diameter particulates are released into the air when welding wires get subjected to extreme heat and can be easily inhaled and absorbed into the body. Additionally, hexavalent chromium particulates, which are toxic, can travel in these fumes and cause different types of serious health problems, including cancer. The absence of a comprehensive weld fume control system will not only put the health of workers in an entire facility at risk, but may also be considered a violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) “General Duty Clause.” This directive requires manufacturers to provide a safe and healthy workplace and, with regard to welding facilities, to adhere to air contaminant requirements, one of which is to maintain the presence of specific toxic substances, like manganese and hexavalent chromium, within permissible exposure levels (PELs).
Industrial welding dust filtration and control, as explained in the website of RoboVent, may be effectively and efficiently accomplished thru the installation of a weld fume ventilation system for any of the following purposes:
- Manual Welding Source Capture. Source capture is a proven way to reduce weld fumes in manual welding operations. Collecting fumes at the point of welding ensures a more efficient means of capture and a higher degree of safety for workers.
- Manual Welding Ambient Systems. Ambient solutions for manual welding stations capture weld fumes from the environment, improving the air for workers and the entire facility.
- Portable Weld Fume Smoke Extraction. These self-contained systems enable workers to capture weld fumes from any location. When production lines or welding cells must remain flexible, these systems safeguard workers, no matter the situation.
- Robotic Welding. RoboVent offers multiple systems for addressing the special concerns of robotic welding. Cutting-edge collectors provide workers and facilities the highest levels of protection possible.
Manufacturers who are concerned about productivity and who make the safety of their workers top priority should never think twice investing in what will keep their facility clean and with good breathable air.
Effects of Car Accidents on Victims
Car accidents can happen even just because of a single mistake, such as when the driver has failed to negotiate a curve or when he has been too distracted to see an abruptly turning vehicle. Whatever the cause may be, nothing is going to change – damage has been done, and it may have significant effects to the victims involved.
Injuries are the first things that come to mind when it comes to car accidents. The worst injuries associated with traffic accidents are the following:
- Amputations, sustained from entrapments
- Brain trauma, sustained from hitting the head into a hard surface
- Facial disfigurement, sustained from getting hit by projectiles
- Fractures, sustained from receiving excessive force
- Paralysis, sustained from neck and back injuries
Whether the injury is minor or major, victims will most likely need medical attention as a precaution, and medical attention does not come for free. Depending on the severity of the injury, this can reach up to thousands of dollars.
It’s worse if the accident has occurred because of the recklessness of another party. The good news is, according to the website of Habush Habush & Rottier S.C. ®, those who have been hurt because of another person’s mistake may get compensation, such as for the medical costs of the injuries sustained.
Getting involved in a traumatic event such as a car accident has a psychological toll to its victims. They can sustain post-traumatic stress disorder, where they may re-experience the traumatic event, in the form of flashbacks and nightmares. These re-experiences are even worse when the victims are in the presence of specific stimulus that may be related to the crash, such as cars or the sound of car engines.
They may also be vulnerable to depression, emotional detachment, social withdrawal, and escapist behaviors, such as overeating, oversleeping, substance abuse, and worst of all, suicide.
There are state and federal laws that protect consumers from deceptive trade practices, but there are still businesses in Houston that still try to deceive their market. In a business point of view, these practices could be seen as opportunities to generate more income. But these opportunities are utilized in the expense of the consumers, and therefore could be deemed unethical.
Businesses use a variety of techniques to deceive their customers, like false advertising, which may lead the public into buying a product or service because of deceptive representations; and misleading prices, which may entice the public to buy the product or service because of misrepresented price ranges.
Deceptive trade practices are actually not just utilized by big businesses. The unethical practices are also used by individuals. They do such things to sell their products at much higher prices. For example, they advertise a good as something original or new when in fact it has just been reconditioned. Sometimes, they also adjust the odometer of a vehicle they are selling to reduce the number of miles.
As a customer, these practices put you in a disadvantage, and the businesses and individuals responsible could be held liable. According to the website of Williams Kherkher business lawyers, most consumer protection cases against Houston businesses are based on the following laws:
- Consumer Protection Laws – prevents businesses from practicing anything that could take advantage of the customers
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act – makes sure that the guidelines for warranty practices are precise and can be legally implemented
- Consumer Product Safety Commission – prevents manufacturers and designers from introducing dangerous products into the market
You have to remember that you are a consumer that is protected by state and federal laws, so don’t be afraid to step forward and make the businesses pay for intentionally putting you in a disadvantage.
Living up to the country’s moniker as the land of equal opportunity, the United States federal government has taken huge strides in protecting right of each worker to receive fair and equal compensation. As such, every individual employed in America is expected to be compensated with no less than a minimum wage of $7.25 for every hour of work. Similarly, many of these employees are also required by law to receive additional wages for time spent rendering services over the regular 40-hour work week. Both these rules found in the Fair Labor Standards Act , abbreviated as FLSA, are meant to cover a huge majority of the American workforce, including undocumented workers who may not have proper immigration status.
The FLSA puts it quite clearly: barring very few circumstances, all workers employed in the United States are entitled to overtime wages. In no way does the FLSA single out undocumented workers in its entire treatise. Regardless of one’s immigration status, all employees in America are expected to receive the same legal protection when it comes to the payment of wages. Just like every other American employee, these workers have every right to consult with an overtime pay attorney and pursue a claim for unpaid wages with the Department of Labor or their state court. In these proceedings, an undocumented worker’s claim must be evaluated in the same way as any other claim would be. Employers arguing the claim are, therefore, prohibited from bringing up issues of immigration and citizenship in order to influence the outcome of the petition.
Through changing social and cultural conversations, much of the U.S. has made significant progress in protecting the rights of undocumented workers. These developments were widely influenced by a few notable FLSA violation cases from the last few years. One of these cases was ruled on by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2011. The case Solis v. Cindy’s Total Care, Inc., filed by the Department of Labor, involved a luxury nail salon which argued that the undocumented workers in their employ were exempt from FLSA coverage. District Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled otherwise, emphasizing that the FLSA notably covers “any individual” in its policies, without ever explicitly ruling out foreign residents or undocumented workers.
If you and your spouse are settling a divorce case in the state of Texas, having filed your petition for divorce under the “no fault” ground may help lessen the emotional burden; however, once the process comes to that part where you and your spouse need to settle divorce-related issues, which may include child custody, among others, then it is more likely that the process will be more emotional and contested unless you and your spouse find a way to settle all issues in friendlier ways.
If, however, despite the court’s encouragement, you and your spouse fail to come to an agreement, then expect that the courts will do all things possible to make sure that the child, especially if he/she is a minor, will be spared from any form of trauma. The courts will also have to make the decision on who shall have custody or conservatorship of the child.
Assuming, however, that the spouses/parents are able to arrive at an amicable settlement and are able to draw up an agreement that contains provisions for conservatorship, then the court may recognize such agreement but only if it finds that agreement to be in the child’s best interest. The spouses may then file their written agreement with the court which, in turn, may decide to render an order wherein both spouses are appointed as joint managing conservators.
Texas courts reserve the right to decide over issues relating to child conservatorship or custody. If it deems necessary, instead of joint conservatorship, it may decide for sole conservatorship, wherein custody is awarded to only one of the parents. This means that the child will reside with the appointed custodial parent with that parent having the exclusive right to make decisions about the child’s growth and development.
As much as possible, Texas courts still prefer joint conservatorship arrangements to allow the child to maintain a meaningful relationship with both parents. Under a joint custody arrangement, both parents share the decision-making responsibilities for their child.